From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19663 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2006 19:31:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 19654 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Mar 2006 19:31:03 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:31:01 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FGLQ3-0002uk-D0; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:30:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:31:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: bugzilla vs dejagnu Message-ID: <20060306193058.GA11100@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <440C8C46.4000400@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <440C8C46.4000400@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:23:50PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > A thread on oversears@ brings up an interesting point. > > Where's GDB at with respect to migrating from dejagnu to bugzilla, is > there still an intent for this to happen? I assume you mean GNATS to bugzilla? I still want it to happen. But I don't think anyone had decided what to do about all the GNATS PR numbers in DejaGNU; we could preserve them, but only by setting up a separate bugzilla installation, instead of sharing with the rest of sourceware (and I think sharing the installation would be in our best interests). -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery