From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9619 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2006 17:43:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 9603 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2006 17:43:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:43:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A63F48CE53; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:43:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26354-01-9; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:43:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.108.108]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A9648CE52; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:43:39 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id D379847E7F; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:43:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:43:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: dj_barrow@ariasoft.ie Cc: Dave Korn , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: how to get uptodate vxworks gdb source code Message-ID: <20060302174337.GM1475@adacore.com> References: <036201c63dff$45f33780$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <20060302153123.51251.qmail@web51109.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060302153123.51251.qmail@web51109.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 > From my understanding of GPL they have to make the sources freely > available to everyone, the licence is supposed to be infectious Gnu > wouldn't neuter this licence. The latest gdb available on their > website which they is gdb-5.3 for tornado-2.2. Without discussing your mistaken understanding of the GPL... I am afraid that getting the sources from WindRiver will not help you with RDB, because their debugger do *not* have support for the RDB protocol as far as I know. They do what they recommend, they use WTX. In your case, I would really stay away from RDB, and stay away from WTX which is being phased out. Use DFW, and as I said, you do have an example of a DFW target implementation in our GDB whose sources are freely available (libre.adacore.com). And we won't even require you to be a customer of ours! ;-). -- Joel