Re: MI: reporting of multiple breakpoints

Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-18T17:42:19Z

On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 06:23:14PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:46:53 -0500
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > Cc: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>, ghost@cs.msu.su,
> > gdb@sources.redhat.com
> >
> > Do we want to uniformly present watchpoints as after-the-store, as
> > a least common denominator and for consistency?
>
> Don't we do this already? I thought we did.

Yes, sorry I was unclear - that is what we do (although I think the
implementation could use a little improvement, based on past
conversations on this list). Just wanted to present that there are,
in fact, alternatives.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery