Re: MI: reporting of multiple breakpoints

Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-18T16:23:40Z

> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:46:53 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>, ghost@cs.msu.su,
> gdb@sources.redhat.com
>
> Do we want to uniformly present watchpoints as after-the-store, as
> a least common denominator and for consistency?

Don't we do this already? I thought we did.