From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16322 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2006 17:42:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 16310 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Feb 2006 17:42:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:42:17 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FAW63-0006G9-Cr for gdb@sourceware.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:42:15 -0500 Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:50:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: MI: reporting of multiple breakpoints Message-ID: <20060218174215.GA24047@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <17398.11182.747232.774924@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20060217200712.GB30145@nevyn.them.org> <17398.12047.624911.347942@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20060217202047.GC30881@nevyn.them.org> <17398.15554.431196.208031@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20060217211942.GA609@nevyn.them.org> <20060218154653.GB21241@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 06:23:14PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:46:53 -0500 > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > Cc: Paul Koning , ghost@cs.msu.su, > > gdb@sources.redhat.com > > > > Do we want to uniformly present watchpoints as after-the-store, as > > a least common denominator and for consistency? > > Don't we do this already? I thought we did. Yes, sorry I was unclear - that is what we do (although I think the implementation could use a little improvement, based on past conversations on this list). Just wanted to present that there are, in fact, alternatives. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery