From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14388 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2006 20:32:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 14380 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Feb 2006 20:32:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:32:15 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FACGy-0008Ly-9T; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:32:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Vladimir Prus , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI: reporting of multiple breakpoints Message-ID: <20060217203212.GF30881@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Vladimir Prus , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20060217153211.GA21402@nevyn.them.org> <20060217194426.GA28988@nevyn.them.org> <20060217200558.GA30145@nevyn.them.org> <20060217202419.GD30881@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00221.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 10:28:07PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > But what about the commands associated with that breakpoint? We've > > > reached the address and stopped, allright, but we didn't run the > > > commands the user wanted us to, did we? > > > > We should run them when we stop. That's what I'm trying to say :-) > > Do we run them now? If not, I think we agree that we should fix that. I think arranging to print everything we consider "hit" will fix this as a side effect. At least I hope so. We've discussed this exact behavior before, by the way, and I think we reached the exact same conclusion, but no one fixed it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery