From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11001 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2006 16:04:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 10979 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Feb 2006 16:04:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:04:56 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FA86H-0005pA-Vo; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:04:54 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sourceware.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI: reporting of multiple breakpoints Message-ID: <20060217160453.GA22362@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20060217153211.GA21402@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20060217190400.a6xOF41yzTEzkohgJ18eksVIanknBAk--y9PHIqwnBc@z> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 06:47:59PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > CLI reports two watchpoints, and MI reports just one. I did not test more > complex combinations, like mix of watchpoints and breakpoints that trigger > on the same line. More complex combinations will provide more interesting messes. I believe it's only watchpoints that "work". > > It's not entirely obvious what ought to happen. > > Well, all breakpoints which stop conditions are satisfied should be > reported, I guess. I think this is right but it may be a bit of trouble to implement. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery