From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-24231-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31437 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2006 20:31:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 31400 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2006 20:31:13 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:31:09 +0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) 	by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1AKUITt002669; 	Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:30:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1AKUHnt029629; 	Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:30:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1AKUHAH026444; 	Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:30:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:31:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200602102030.k1AKUHAH026444@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: ghost@cs.msu.su, eliz@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20060210145950.GA23266@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:59:50 -0500)
Subject: Re: MI error messages
References: <dshtpc$frg$1@sea.gmane.org> <ulkwj2zvj.fsf@gnu.org> <20060210134700.GA21328@nevyn.them.org> <200602101703.35029.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20060210145950.GA23266@nevyn.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2

> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on 
> 	elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
> 	version=3.1.0
> X-From_: gdb-return-24220-m.m.kettenis=alumnus.utwente.nl@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 10 16:00:26 2006
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:59:50 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>, 	Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
> Content-Disposition: inline
> X-IsSubscribed: yes
> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
> Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information.
> X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> X-MailScanner-From: gdb-return-24220-m.m.kettenis=alumnus.utwente.nl@sourceware.org
> 
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 05:03:34PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > On Friday 10 February 2006 16:47, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:54:08PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > > > From:  Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
> > > > > Date:  Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:35:08 +0300
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Is it guaranteed that all MI error message start with function name
> > > > > and a semicolon?
> > > >
> > > > I see a small number of error messages that don't, but those are
> > > > probably bugs that need to be fixed.
> > >
> > > Really?  Why?  I don't think the function name adds much value in
> > > user-level error messages.  Internal errors, sure.
> > 
> > Does it mean that function names should be removed from error messages to 
> > user?
> 
> I have no idea.  Personally, I think they should be.

I agree.

Mark