From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13519 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2006 14:03:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 13510 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2006 14:03:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su (HELO zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su) (158.250.17.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:03:54 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su with spam-scanned (Exim 4.50) id 1F7YsJ-0006y6-RR for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:03:52 +0300 Received: from zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su ([158.250.17.23]) by zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F7Ys3-0006xU-Oq; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:03:35 +0300 From: Vladimir Prus To: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: MI error messages Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:03:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20060210134700.GA21328@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060210134700.GA21328@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602101703.35029.ghost@cs.msu.su> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 On Friday 10 February 2006 16:47, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:54:08PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Vladimir Prus > > > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:35:08 +0300 > > > > > > 1. Is it guaranteed that all MI error message start with function name > > > and a semicolon? > > > > I see a small number of error messages that don't, but those are > > probably bugs that need to be fixed. > > Really? Why? I don't think the function name adds much value in > user-level error messages. Internal errors, sure. Does it mean that function names should be removed from error messages to user? - Volodya