From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29650 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2006 22:02:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 29642 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jan 2006 22:02:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from eastrmmtao03.cox.net (HELO eastrmmtao03.cox.net) (68.230.240.36) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:02:34 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([68.9.66.48]) by eastrmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060126220235.ZFXU29285.eastrmmtao03.cox.net@localhost.localdomain>; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:02:35 -0500 Received: from bob by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1F2FCu-0004J8-2e; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:03:08 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:32:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Mark Kettenis , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Using XML in GDB? Message-ID: <20060126220308.GB15600@brasko.net> References: <20060126055744.GA29647@nevyn.them.org> <43D8BB89.4090900@st.com> <20060126134124.GA3107@nevyn.them.org> <43D8E573.1060004@st.com> <20060126163832.GA7113@nevyn.them.org> <200601262103.k0QL3Jdo030305@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060126211252.GA17685@nevyn.them.org> <200601262140.k0QLesNa008856@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060126215731.GB17685@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060126215731.GB17685@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 > If it builds automatically in a GDB source tree, do you have any > concerns about using a third-party XML parser? None. On top of that, when I'm down with my MI parser, it could be very beneficial to some folks, if it would translate to XML. Honestly, I really think the nonsense of parsing these adhoc protocols has to go away. I'm excited about what you are doing. People like me spend a significant amount of time working on adhoc protocols. The time could be spent better on other things. Bob Rossi