From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-24080-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 25870 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2006 21:03:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 25861 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jan 2006 21:03:55 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:03:54 +0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) 	by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0QL3JMJ015998; 	Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:03:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0QL3JHi029614; 	Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:03:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0QL3Jdo030305; 	Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:03:19 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:05:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200601262103.k0QL3Jdo030305@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20060126163832.GA7113@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:38:32 -0500)
Subject: Re: Using XML in GDB?
References: <20060126055744.GA29647@nevyn.them.org> <43D8BB89.4090900@st.com> <20060126134124.GA3107@nevyn.them.org> <43D8E573.1060004@st.com> <20060126163832.GA7113@nevyn.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00280.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:38:32 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> I'm not going to pursue this for now because of IP issues; the terms on
> the SPIRIT documents make me leery of using them for an open source
> program, at least without talking to a lawyer about it first.

Are these documents public?  If not we should stay away from this
stuff.  But if they are public, I can't see why we cannot implement an
interface specification.

Mark