Re: Using XML in GDB?

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 12:07:37PM +0000, Andrew STUBBS wrote:
> I don't have anything to add to the XML debate yet. The idea of the 
> "target available feature" interface sounds interesting and may be of 
> use to us here, but I am having a little difficulty tracking down 
> details. I have found the beginning of this conversation in the May 
> archives, but it is always harder to find the definitive conclusion.
> 
> Is there anywhere you can point me to find the final specification of 
> what this interface will include - what features will it describe, what 
> aspects of those features are covered? Is it just limited to registers?

There isn't a definitive conclusion because it's evolved substantially
once I began (re-) implementing it.  This is what I had two weeks ago:

  http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2005-05/msg00171.html

But it doesn't look entirely like that any more.

Registers can be generically described without hard-coded GDB
knowledge.  Most other features can't, except for their presence or
absence.  But the point of suggesting XML is to keep this extensible
should someone have a bright idea :-)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery