From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14872 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2006 17:58:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 14863 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jan 2006 17:58:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:58:07 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1F15x7-0005iK-OC; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:58:05 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:34:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: David Lamy-Charrier , GDB List Subject: Re: breakpoint commands no more working due to MI front-end Message-ID: <20060123175805.GA21860@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: David Lamy-Charrier , GDB List References: <6541ed4c0601230241p2646be6bm87251b26a935bb7e@mail.gmail.com> <20060123134952.GA13642@nevyn.them.org> <6541ed4c0601230745o6e063cb6he3ec808e544cd887@mail.gmail.com> <20060123160220.GB16524@nevyn.them.org> <6541ed4c0601230905q50e4a6b1rc8e4659b63589633@mail.gmail.com> <20060123173657.GA20650@nevyn.them.org> <20060123175359.GC9308@brasko.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060123175359.GC9308@brasko.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00224.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:53:59PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote: > I think not allowing this would severaly limit the use of GDB for a lot > of users. People in general already have an entire set of breakpoint > commands written. I don't think it would be a good idea to make the > users translate these commands to a FE specific format, especially > since each front end would be different. Then what should GDB do? Treat the command list as CLI commands or current interpreter commands? How about the poster's original issue: should their output come out before the *stopped? After? Replacing it? That's why I called it presently poorly defined :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery