From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2302 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2006 22:33:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 2289 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jan 2006 22:33:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:33:48 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0KMX40s028986; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:33:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0KMX3Vx006785; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:33:03 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0KMX3co000072; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:33:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:09:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200601202233.k0KMX3co000072@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: jimb@red-bean.com CC: gdb@sourceware.org, fnasser@redhat.com In-reply-to: <8f2776cb0601201422r6923451fg92a4b07bc3444fe6@mail.gmail.com> (message from Jim Blandy on Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:22:37 -0800) Subject: Re: Is the current KOD code useful? References: <20060119165226.GA11310@nevyn.them.org> <20060120202933.GA13428@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0601201413s5b027bcenc1939b3aa675ba91@mail.gmail.com> <8f2776cb0601201422r6923451fg92a4b07bc3444fe6@mail.gmail.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:22:37 -0800 > From: Jim Blandy > > On 1/20/06, Jim Blandy wrote: > > On 1/20/06, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > Copying this to Fernando, since I belatedly noticed Fernando's entry > > > in MAINTAINERS for this today. Oops! > > > > Michael Snyder has been working a lot with Cisco of late; he's offered > > to ask around there to see if people are still using it, for what > > that's worth. > > The word from Cisco is that they're not using KOD these days. Then I propose that, unless Fernando objects, we remove KOD from gdb. Mark