From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10013 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2006 23:19:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 10005 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jan 2006 23:19:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:19:50 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EzMai-0004yd-NW; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:19:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Fwd: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1 Message-ID: <20060118231948.GA19079@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20060117211914.GA13055@nevyn.them.org> <39BD9F7D-F512-40EA-804A-DBE9BAC97E2B@apple.com> <20060118173155.GM28863@synopsys.com> <8f2776cb0601181040s4970ce9es15ebdcae50dccda2@mail.gmail.com> <20060118184426.GA10381@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0601181058r23b810dg9d926e40f07d0704@mail.gmail.com> <20060118190120.GA11089@nevyn.them.org> <200601182224.k0IMO9Y7030185@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601182224.k0IMO9Y7030185@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:24:09PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Let's forget about them. The mostly bogus signed vs. unsigned char > ones dominate the useful warnings for the other integers. > > Is there any reason not to commit my -Werror patch now (with the > -Wno-pointer-sign)? It's fine with me, but I'd like to make sure Jim agrees first; I'm not sure if he's said or not. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery