From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16667 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2006 22:24:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 16659 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jan 2006 22:24:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:24:45 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0IMOALi029218; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:24:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0IMO90O024392; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:24:09 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0IMO9Y7030185; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:24:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:18:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200601182224.k0IMO9Y7030185@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@false.org CC: gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060118190120.GA11089@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:01:20 -0500) Subject: Re: Fwd: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1 References: <20060117211914.GA13055@nevyn.them.org> <39BD9F7D-F512-40EA-804A-DBE9BAC97E2B@apple.com> <20060118173155.GM28863@synopsys.com> <8f2776cb0601181040s4970ce9es15ebdcae50dccda2@mail.gmail.com> <20060118184426.GA10381@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0601181058r23b810dg9d926e40f07d0704@mail.gmail.com> <20060118190120.GA11089@nevyn.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00176.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:01:20 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:58:59AM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote: > > On 1/18/06, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:40:55AM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote: > > > > The message below is kind of odd. We do use -Wall > > > > > > No, we don't. See the comments in configure.ac about this. > > > > D'oh. You're right, of course. > > > > > Sorry, that wasn't my goal. My goal with forwarding this to the GCC > > > list was independent of what GDB should do - as Joe wrote, the GCC SC > > > made a promise to RMS that I'm trying to make sure doesn't slip through > > > the cracks. > > > > Okay. I'd gotten the impression from your conversation with Eli that > > the plan was to just forget the whole thing if future GCC's were going > > to drop the warning. > > Nah - my plan is to forget the whole thing if we decide to, but no one > wants to decide. Let's forget about them. The mostly bogus signed vs. unsigned char ones dominate the useful warnings for the other integers. Is there any reason not to commit my -Werror patch now (with the -Wno-pointer-sign)? Mark