From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32197 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2006 17:50:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 32183 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jan 2006 17:50:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:50:27 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EyC1J-0001wu-9h for gdb@sourceware.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:50:25 -0500 Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:50:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] multiple breakpoints from FILE:LINE Message-ID: <20060115175025.GA7415@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <200601151736.k0FHapQB157574@quasar.engr.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601151736.k0FHapQB157574@quasar.engr.sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00124.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:36:51AM -0800, David Anderson wrote: > The multiple breakpoints due-to-inlining discussion has > mentioned 20 or 21 breakpoints. > > What if there are 200 or 2000 or 20000 or more inlining sites > of one function? > > A breakpoint listing won't be very usable either, whether of > 2000 entries or one entry with 2000 break addresses. Will it? That's why I was not planning on showing the list of locations by default - you'd have to "drill down" into it for details. Yes, I've thought about this issue. It will require changes in lots of other bits of GDB, though. For instance removing and reinserting all breakpoints becomes impractical. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery