From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11699 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2006 21:51:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 11691 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2006 21:51:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com (HELO e31.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.149) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 21:51:36 +0000 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k06LpYlf006171 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 16:51:34 -0500 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id k06LoD0o264368 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 14:50:13 -0700 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k06LpYeR011774 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 14:51:34 -0700 Received: from dyn9047022123-009047022095.beaverton.ibm.com (dyn9047022123-009047022095.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.22.95]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k06LpYpG011694; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 14:51:34 -0700 From: Paul Gilliam Reply-To: pgilliam@us.ibm.com To: Michael Snyder , gdb@sources.redhat.com, Johan Rydberg , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Dave Brolley , Eric Bachalo Subject: Re: Return to Reverse Execution Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 21:51:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <43BC376F.4000307@redhat.com> <20060106195720.GB18951@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060106195720.GB18951@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601061431.00536.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 My $0.02: On Friday 06 January 2006 11:57, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:00:31PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > > So here is my proposed gdb user interface. > > 1) A set of new commands that mimic the existing ones, > > to include: > > reverse-step (rs) > > reverse-next (rn) > > reverse-continue (rc) > > reverse-finish (rf) > > I'm fine with these names. I think that we are not going to reach a > consensus on whether "reverse" or "back" is better, but I don't think that > means we should offer both; I think we should just pick one, use it > consistently, and document it consistently. > 'back' has 57% fewer keystrokes than 'reverse'. -=# Paul #=-