From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Stepping over longjmp presumably broken for glibc
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200512300932.jBU9WBn6015669@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051230023830.GA26004@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:38:31 -0500)
> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:38:31 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 08:24:30PM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
> > Here's my (non-qualifying because it relies on help from the runtime)
> > idea: can't we use Dwarf CFI here? That is, treat longjmp as a weird
> > function whose CFI indicates that it unwinds to the setjmp. The
> > DW_CFA_val_expression operator, new in the released Dwarf 3 spec,
> > allows CFI to use an arbitrary expression to compute the saved value
> > of the register; we can apply that to the return address column just
> > as well as anything else. In the case Daniel described, the
> > expression would use DW_OP_xor (probably the first use ever of that
> > opcode!).
>
> How would you distinguish a longjmp with CFI that returns to caller
> from a longjmp with CFI that returns to setjmp?
Huh? longjmp() always returns to a context saved by a setjmp().
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-30 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-22 21:17 Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-23 3:32 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-23 8:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-23 13:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-23 15:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-23 15:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-23 17:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-23 17:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-23 17:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-23 18:01 ` Simon Richter
2005-12-24 11:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-24 16:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-24 16:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-24 16:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-26 4:06 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-26 5:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-27 4:24 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-30 2:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-30 9:32 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2005-12-30 16:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-02 5:25 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-06 19:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-06 20:28 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-06 20:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-06 20:53 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-06 21:27 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-01-06 21:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200512300932.jBU9WBn6015669@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox