From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14878 invoked by alias); 26 Dec 2005 07:52:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 14870 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Dec 2005 07:52:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from svr68.ehostpros.com (HELO svr68.ehostpros.com) (67.15.48.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:52:36 +0000 Received: from [59.95.0.136] (helo=titan.linsyssoft.com) by svr68.ehostpros.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52) id 1Eqn9d-0003qf-Nr for gdb@sourceware.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:52:26 -0800 Received: from pythagoras.linsyssoft.com (pythagoras [192.168.1.3] (may be forged)) by titan.linsyssoft.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBQ7dVpS003685 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:09:31 +0530 From: Amit Kale To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Breakpoints in constructors Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:52:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200512151935.54801.amitkale@linsyssoft.com> In-Reply-To: <200512151935.54801.amitkale@linsyssoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512261322.29545.amitkale@linsyssoft.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00200.txt.bz2 Would you like us to rebase this patch to current cvs tree to make it easier to review it? -Amit On Thursday 15 Dec 2005 7:35 pm, Amit Kale wrote: > Hi, > > I am posting this on behalf of TimeSys Corporation. We had developed a fix > (read hack) to enable gdb to place breakpoints in C++ constructors. This > work was done on gdb 6.2 (patch attached). > > I was planning to post this patch after rebasing to current gdb, but then > found that there was some communication on this earlier. I would like to > know gdb guru's opinion on this patch. Does this appear to much of a hack? > Someone else working on a better solution? > > Any help on this patch and/or directions for making this right will be > highly appreciated. > Thanks. > -Amit