From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 979 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2005 04:30:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 972 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Dec 2005 04:30:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 04:30:36 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ElfKa-0000CP-TL; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:30:32 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 04:30:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Randolph Chung Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb and c++ method names Message-ID: <20051212043032.GA735@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Randolph Chung , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <439CEB4C.5050205@tausq.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <439CEB4C.5050205@tausq.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 11:15:24AM +0800, Randolph Chung wrote: > Is this expected behavior? No, but we know this area of GDB is not in great shape. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC