Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Greg Bronevetsky <greg@bronevetsky.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Checkpoint-restart with different code
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 22:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051209220840.GA24624@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4399FDE5.2020905@bronevetsky.com>

On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 04:57:57PM -0500, Greg Bronevetsky wrote:
> I see that there's been some discussion on this list on checkpointing 
> techniques that may be included in gdb. My research group at Cornell is 
> working on a number of such checkpointers for both sequential and 
> parallel programs and we recently decided to try a more challenging 
> variant of checkpointing where the user can take a checkpoint of their 
> program, modify their source code a bit (add remove stack variables, 
> move function calls around a bit and a few other things) and then resume 
> computation using the modified code. This seems to be very useful for 
> debugging long-running applications since the user would be able to work 
> around the bug without losing a week's or month's worth of results. (can 
> happen in high-performance computing) Similarly, its useful for 
> situations where your execution is in some particularly buggy corner 
> case and you want to keep making modifications and trying them out 
> without having to guide the program's execution back into that corner 
> case after every code change.
> 
> My question is, has anybody heard of anything that can do this? 
> Obviously, this kind of checkpointing would require compiler support, so 
> gdb wouldn't have done this, but have you heard of any systems/research 
> that has addressed this question? Thanks.

Better: I know at least one production debug environment which supports
this - Apple's Xcode.  The option is called fix-and-continue.  I don't
think they combine it with checkpointing, though, only as an action on
a running process.  It's partly compiler-based and partly in their
debug environment.

Merging that with Michael's fork-based code would be fairly
straightforward, I expect.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-09 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-09 21:58 Greg Bronevetsky
2005-12-09 22:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-12-10  1:36   ` Randolph Chung
2005-12-10 20:34   ` Greg Bronevetsky
2005-12-11  3:53     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-13 19:58 Prateek Saxena

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051209220840.GA24624@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=greg@bronevetsky.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox