From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14899 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2005 02:30:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 14867 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2005 02:30:13 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 02:30:10 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Ejp4H-0004KO-HW; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:30:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 02:30:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Sp3cial K Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb cannot set registers in frames Message-ID: <20051207023005.GA16618@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Sp3cial K , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 08:18:04PM -0500, Sp3cial K wrote: > Hi, > > I've encountered this strangeness a couple of times, so this should be > easily reproduced. If not, I'll post a test sample. > > The gdb version is 5.3... Is that a typo, or are you really using GDB 5.3? If so, we can't help you; all the frame and register bits have been completely redone since then, and much improved. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC