From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3537 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2005 22:15:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 3529 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2005 22:15:05 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:15:03 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EhDkX-0000fh-Jp; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:14:57 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:36:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Mark Kettenis , pgilliam@us.ibm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: What should be used instead of deprecated_read_memory_nobpt()? Message-ID: <20051129221457.GB2238@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Mark Kettenis , pgilliam@us.ibm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200511291401.30945.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <200511292204.jATM4R1s022362@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20051129220752.GQ954@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051129220752.GQ954@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00628.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 02:07:52PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > Not sure, but read_memory_unsigned_integer() might not be safe, > > because of the possibility of inserted breakpoints. > > Are there targets that do not remove breakpoints when the target stops? No, this is target independent. But someday I hope that GDB will not require this. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC