From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-23549-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5156 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2005 18:03:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 5149 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2005 18:03:33 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:03:33 +0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) 	id 1Eh9p8-0007YV-KZ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:03:26 -0500
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:33:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@hogyros.de>, 	Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>, 	GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ARM RDI
Message-ID: <20051129180326.GA29028@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>, 	Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@hogyros.de>, 	Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>, 	GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
References: <438B8FAD.1020804@codesourcery.com> <1133259214.32658.36.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20051129134436.GA22387@nevyn.them.org> <438C6192.10109@hogyros.de> <20051129142714.GA23172@nevyn.them.org> <438C95BF.10109@codesourcery.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <438C95BF.10109@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00619.txt.bz2

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:54:07AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > There are a number of other ways to use RDI besides rdi-share.
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> Some of the board vendors also ship GDB<->RDI converters.  As you say, I
> have very little confidence that the current rdi-share actually works
> with most things.
> 
> If consensus has been reached to remove rdi-share, may I post a patch
> for review?  Or, if we don't think we can get that consensus, how about
> at least a patch to make it a configure-time option, off by default?

Consensus can't be reached in one day :-)

Let's come back to this next week, please.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC