From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-23544-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1968 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2005 13:44:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 1956 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2005 13:44:40 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:44:40 +0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) 	id 1Eh5mf-0005q3-Dn; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:44:37 -0500
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:12:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>, GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ARM RDI
Message-ID: <20051129134436.GA22387@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>, 	Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>, GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
References: <438B8FAD.1020804@codesourcery.com> <1133259214.32658.36.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1133259214.32658.36.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00614.txt.bz2

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:13:34AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 23:15, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > In my quest to make things build on Windows, I see that ARM GDB doesn't
> > quite build for Windows do the fact that rdi-share doesn't build without
> > angeldll.h.  However, rdi-share does still build on GNU/Linux, where
> > rdi-share isn't required.
> > 
> > Since RDI has been declared obsolete by ARM, and since the version in
> > GDB is even more obsolete than that, I'm not sure that there's much
> > point in continuing to try to support RDI.
> > 
> > There seem to be several options, ordered, IMHO, from best to worst.
> > 
> > 1) Remove rdi-share from GDB entirely.
> 
> I think this one is probably best now...  I discussed it with Andrew at
> the Summit and we agreed it was the way to go.  But like dejagnu removal
> it's taking a long time to finally do it...

Does anyone object?  If not, let's just do it.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC