From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5741 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2005 21:38:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 5734 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Nov 2005 21:38:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:38:51 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EflHN-0002Bl-OG for gdb@sourceware.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:38:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Maintainer policy for GDB Message-ID: <20051125213849.GA8364@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <20051124171814.GI1635@adacore.com> <20051125030605.GA20073@nevyn.them.org> <20051125052810.GA23958@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20051125160454.GB29028@nevyn.them.org> <20051125204347.GA7107@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00568.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:02:49PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > If that is so, we will watch most of the current maintainers being > politely asked to step down. When the last of them goes, you can then > have your suggested approval procedure, since most areas will be left > without RMs ;-) Hmm. We can manage better than that. But, let's worry about the details of that a little later in the process, please. We need a concrete value for N. Joel has suggested anything from a week to ten days. I would prefer a week or less. Chris suggested a month, you suggested three weeks in response. Can we all reach compromise on two weeks? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC