From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-23492-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1351 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2005 17:07:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 1281 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Nov 2005 17:07:17 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:07:16 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE9E48D15A 	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:07:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1])  by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP  id 03202-01-5 for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:07:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.108.108]) 	by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D105B48D151 	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:07:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) 	id 8BD4647E79; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:07:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:53:00 -0000
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Maintainer policy for GDB
Message-ID: <20051125170712.GO1635@adacore.com>
References: <yf2wtj0gpb2.fsf@kealia.sfbay.sun.com> <ulkzfyx8s.fsf@gnu.org> <20051123195558.GZ1635@adacore.com> <ubr0azm2f.fsf@gnu.org> <20051124171814.GI1635@adacore.com> <u1x15zstf.fsf@gnu.org> <20051125030605.GA20073@nevyn.them.org> <20051125052810.GA23958@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <uy83dxgy2.fsf@gnu.org> <20051125160454.GB29028@nevyn.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20051125160454.GB29028@nevyn.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00562.txt.bz2

> You see, I was thinking a couple of days, or up to a week.  I think
> much longer than a week is effectively the same as not allowing
> timeouts at all.

I was actually thinking one week to 10 days. I like the idea of
providing feedback on simple things not area-specific such as style
while waiting for the responsible maintainer to be available.

-- 
Joel