From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13035 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2005 23:20:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 13022 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Nov 2005 23:20:12 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:20:09 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAMNK5Uc014865; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:20:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jAMNK4nr005103; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:20:04 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jAMNK32w018173; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:20:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:20:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200511222320.jAMNK32w018173@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: brobecker@adacore.com CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com, gdb-testers@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20051122083855.GH1635@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:38:55 -0800) Subject: Re: First release candidate for GDB 6.4 available References: <20051122083855.GH1635@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00504.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:38:55 -0800 > From: Joel Brobecker > > Hello, > > This is to announce that the first release candidate is now available > for download at: > > ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/gdb/snapshots/branch/gdb-6.3.90.tar.bz2 > ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/gdb/snapshots/branch/gdb-6.3.90.tar.gz > > I will run a quick build & test of this tarball on the following > platforms: alpha-tru64 5.1b, ia64-linux, mips-irix, ppc-aix, > x86-solaris, x86_64-linux, sparc-solaris. > > There should be no surprise there as I have been doing nightly builds > off the branch since it was created and didn't receive any build > breakage incident. > > If you have access to other platforms and would like to report their > status, that would be very helpful. Here's a first batch of OpenBSD targets: amd64-unknown-openbsd3.8: === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 10414 # of unexpected failures 103 # of expected failures 47 # of known failures 56 # of unresolved testcases 4 # of untested testcases 5 # of unsupported tests 18 mips64-sgi-openbsd3.8: === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 9800 # of unexpected failures 662 # of expected failures 47 # of known failures 54 # of unresolved testcases 9 # of untested testcases 7 # of unsupported tests 18 powerpc-apple-openbsd3.8: === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 10458 # of unexpected failures 249 # of expected failures 45 # of known failures 52 # of unresolved testcases 4 # of untested testcases 5 # of unsupported tests 18 sparc-sun-openbsd3.8: === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 10220 # of unexpected failures 147 # of expected failures 141 # of known failures 41 # of unresolved testcases 1 # of untested testcases 7 # of unsupported tests 21 The number of FAILs is generally a bit higher than Linux because: 1. I'm a lazy bum and never XFAILed and KFAILed some tests for unsupported features on OpenBSD. 2. There still are some Linux-specific tests in the testsuite that are enabled for all platforms. 3. The OpenBSD/sgi compiler has some serious problems. The number of failures on OpenBSD/macppc has increased drastically somehwere in the last two months. Seems like someone broke something, but I haven't figured out yet, what :(. Perhaps people should check some other powerpc platforms and compare results with gdb 6.3. I'll try to test OpenBSD/i386, OpenBSD/sparc64 and perhaps OpenBSD/hppa or OpenBSD/m68k later this week. I'll also post results for FreeBSD/amd64 and NetBSD/amd64. Mark