From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18590 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2005 14:19:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 18583 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Nov 2005 14:19:05 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:19:04 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EeYz7-00049a-Di; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:19:01 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:19:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI: asynchronous operation details Message-ID: <20051122141901.GA15858@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200511221649.23598.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20051122140013.GB21354@white> <200511221711.58694.ghost@cs.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200511221711.58694.ghost@cs.msu.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00485.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:11:58PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Except for "interrupt", other occurences are for various flavours of "run" -- > continue/next/nexti/step/stepi/unti/finish. So, it still looks like > "-exec-interrupt" is the only command that can be meaningfully issued while > inferior is running. Not a lot of work has been done on taking advantage of asynchronous execution, since so few targets offer it today. There's going to be more in the future, I think. It's important mostly as an infrastructure change for the GDB internals. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC