Re: Maintainer policy for GDB

Wu Zhou
2005-11-18T03:46:13Z

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 07:26:44PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > > > I think gdbint.texi should document what is implemented, and not what
> > > > will be implemented. A Wiki seems to be a more appropriate place for
> > > > roadmap items. They can be moved to gdbint.texi when they've been
> > > > implemented.
> > >
> > > OK. No objection to referencing a Wiki (by nature a live document)
> > > from MAINTAINERS?
> >
> > How about the website itself? Is a Wiki really better for that purpose?
>
> I think that a wiki is more useful for something intended to be
> free-form and informal, describing the current state of GDB and
> people's half-baked plans. The web site should be more polished.
>
> Just my two cents, though.

I buy this idea. :-) IMHO, WiKi at least provides a open and collaborative
platform for document work, which might be helpful for GDB.

Regards
- Wu Zhou