Re: Maintainer policy for GDB

Christopher Faylor
2005-11-19T22:23:11Z

On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:21:30PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:39:33PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work. For example, the message I'm
>>replying to came without the X-IsSubscribed header, although I'm quite
>>sure you are a subscriber. I did see that header on a message I sent
>>myself; is it possible that you only arranged for this header on the
>>message reflected back to the sender?
>
>That's what I meant by saying that this method not foolproof. My sender
>address does not match my subscription address.
>
>Again, this is not a foolproof way of figuring out if someone is not
>subscribed but it should be a foolproof way of figuring out if someone
>is subscribed, i.e., if you see the header then the sender is definitely
>subscribed. If you don't see the header then the person may or may not
>be subscribed, depending on how they sent the software.
>
>That said, however, I just modified the software to check the header from
>as well as the envelope sender. Maybe this email will show up with the
>X-IsSubscribed header set.

Nope. Oh well.

cgf