From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21261 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2005 03:33:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 21254 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Nov 2005 03:33:04 -0000 Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 03:33:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABF848CF51 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:33:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 00034-02-4 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:33:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.108.108]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FAEB48CF3D for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:33:02 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id AD79547E79; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:33:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 03:33:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Maintainer policy for GDB Message-ID: <20051118033301.GR1635@adacore.com> References: <8f2776cb0511162240q6f550008udda9803b5253fd88@mail.gmail.com> <8f2776cb0511162244u5274377m70684a364a8a7edd@mail.gmail.com> <20051117140353.GA11432@nevyn.them.org> <20051117044801.GA4705@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0511162240q6f550008udda9803b5253fd88@mail.gmail.com> <20051118030711.GB31581@nevyn.them.org> <20051118032644.GQ1635@adacore.com> <20051118033000.GA32482@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051118033000.GA32482@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00370.txt.bz2 > > How about the website itself? Is a Wiki really better for that purpose? > > I think that a wiki is more useful for something intended to be > free-form and informal, describing the current state of GDB and > people's half-baked plans. The web site should be more polished. Oh. I think I misunderstood what would go in. I thought they would be long-term plans aggreed on by the maintainers. Perhaps a Wiki would indeed be useful to hold a summary of the discussion we had about overhauling a bit the hppa unwinder. Hmmm.... -- Joel