From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6529 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2005 02:32:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 6395 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2005 02:32:07 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 02:32:07 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Ebqc9-0002hX-0E; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:32:05 -0500 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 02:32:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Date for first GDB 6.4 pre-release? Message-ID: <20051115023204.GA10357@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20051115023037.GG1635@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051115023037.GG1635@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00281.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 06:30:37PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello, > > My initial plan was to do a first 6.4 pre-release using sources > around Nov 15. But there's still a bit of activity in the branch, > in particular with dwarf2-related changes. So I'm wondering if I > should wait for, say, the 20th of November before making the first > pre-release. > > Right now, the release is still scheduled for Dec 1st. If we follow > the previous patterns, I think we will need one or two pre-releases > before the release is actually made, and they should be made a week > apart. > > I think it's fine if we wait for the 20th. Opinions? I think it's fine either if we do or don't; activity on the branch is liable to stay at a pretty constant level until you tell us to stop ;-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC