From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-23200-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3209 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2005 14:45:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 3129 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2005 14:45:43 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:45:43 +0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EbfaW-00060e-U9; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:45:41 -0500
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:45:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: read watchpoints ignored?
Message-ID: <20051114144540.GA23076@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>,
	Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <20051113164546.GA465@nevyn.them.org> <upsp4i361.fsf@gnu.org> <20051114024345.GB10567@nevyn.them.org> <umzk7j137.fsf@gnu.org> <20051114144244.GB22190@nevyn.them.org> <200511111622.01337.ghost@cs.msu.su> <upsp4i361.fsf@gnu.org> <20051114024345.GB10567@nevyn.them.org> <200511141310.38302.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20051114144118.GA22190@nevyn.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20051114144244.GB22190@nevyn.them.org> <20051114144118.GA22190@nevyn.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00270.txt.bz2

On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 09:41:18AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Could you give this patch a try?  It will need some tweaking to build
> for any native target but i386 but i386 native and remote should work. 
> And I've tested that it fixes the bug for i386 native.

and

On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 09:42:44AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I'm not sure if we can call watchpoint_check when not checking bpstats;
> too much context.  In any case, for now we only need to fix one of the
> two bugs; what do you think of the patch I just posted?

Sorry folks, too early on Monday morning, don't know what I was
thinking.  It does _not_ fix the bug for i386 native, it simply fails
to break the existing read watchpoint support.  We need to fix both
bugs.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC