From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31564 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2005 23:58:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31547 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Nov 2005 23:58:45 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:58:45 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EYuPH-00055h-N5; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:58:39 -0500 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:58:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Dave Korn Cc: 'Mark Kettenis' , woodzltc@cn.ibm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: The root cause for SEGV in evaluating fortran function call, any solution or suggestion? Message-ID: <20051106235839.GB19200@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Korn , 'Mark Kettenis' , woodzltc@cn.ibm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200511032134.jA3LYDsT017248@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:20:04AM -0000, Dave Korn wrote: > ... but beware of the red zone on 64-bit x86, right .... ? > > [e.g. see http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-08/msg00092.html ] Which is why this should be done inside the relevant bits of infcall that already know about the redzone. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC