From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28503 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2005 04:56:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28409 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Oct 2005 04:56:39 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 04:56:39 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EW5F7-00040T-Bt; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 00:56:29 -0400 Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 04:56:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii , Nick Roberts , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Moving GDB sources to subversion? Message-ID: <20051030045629.GA15383@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Nick Roberts , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20051028222253.GX1155@adacore.com> <200510282256.j9SMu2pQ002862@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20051028231430.GA9909@nevyn.them.org> <200510282324.j9SNOHql024377@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <17250.47790.110383.508587@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20051030024709.GA12884@white> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051030024709.GA12884@white> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00218.txt.bz2 On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 10:47:10PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > If it was up to me, I'd rather see GDB switch to a distributed RCS. I > usually have several tree's and it takes a long time to update them all > by hitting the internet each time. Until we get a distributed RCS, > subversion definatly seems like an improvement to CVS. I'd be happy to > see the change. In addition to what Ian said, with which I completely agree, this is not a justification for a distributed version control system. You can do this with cvs (rsync the repository or use cvsup) and with svn (rsync the repository or use svk). -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC