From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5628 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2005 00:15:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5619 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Oct 2005 00:15:19 -0000 Received: from smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (HELO smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.198.201) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with SMTP; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:15:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 41359 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2005 00:15:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lucon.org) (hjjean@sbcglobal.net@67.122.69.173 with login) by smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Oct 2005 00:15:17 -0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 60C2A63F4B; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:15:00 -0000 From: "H. J. Lu" To: Ian Lance Taylor Cc: Joel Brobecker , Mark Kettenis , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Moving GDB sources to subversion? Message-ID: <20051029001516.GA22234@lucon.org> References: <20051028222253.GX1155@adacore.com> <200510282256.j9SMu2pQ002862@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20051028230207.GZ1155@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2 I'd like to see gdb move to bugzilla before subversion. H.J. On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 04:08:34PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Joel Brobecker writes: > > > > > I think GCC is getting ready to move to subversion as the revision > > > > control system. Is there any similar plan for GDB? > > > > > > Why should we? > > > > I wasn't implying that we should. I haven't seen any discussion about > > this (but maybe I missed them). However, I have heard rumors that GCC > > *is* going to move to svn. I think GCC and GDB have been in the same > > physical repository so far (src?), so I was afraid that a change for > > GCC would necessarily impact GDB. > > gcc has moved to subversion. The conversion finished today. > > This does not affect gdb. At present gdb, binutils, newlib, and > cygwin share a single CVS repository. gcc is in a subversion > repository. > > This does affect anybody using the uberbaum pseudo-repository; if you > don't know what that is, don't ask. > > It would be simpler for the sourceware.org overseers (including > myself) if every project converted to subversion. And subversion does > have some advantages over CVS. > > But really each project is going to have to decide for itself whether > to switch or not. > > (If you want to switch to something other than CVS or subversion, you > will have to be prepared to convince the overseers to do whatever > management is required by whatever new system is chosen. Daniel > Berlin went through that process for subversion for gcc.) > > Hope this helps. > > Ian