From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23031 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2005 23:57:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23003 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Oct 2005 23:57:52 -0000 Received: from c-24-61-23-223.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (HELO cgf.cx) (24.61.23.223) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:57:52 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id D7F3913C743; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:57:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Moving GDB sources to subversion? Message-ID: <20051028235750.GB17968@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <20051028222253.GX1155@adacore.com> <200510282256.j9SMu2pQ002862@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20051028231430.GA9909@nevyn.them.org> <20051028232553.GB1155@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051028232553.GB1155@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00208.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 04:25:53PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: >>I'd rather not rehash the months of discussion from the GCC list about >>this :-) >> >>>>From my point of view: > >It is not my intention to push in any direction. I'll be happy to move >to svn if most of us think it's better, but I'm also happy to stick to >CVS. As Ian said, from the point of view of the people who maintain sourceware, it would be easier if everything (or at least every substantial project) moved to using subversion. The benefits have been outlined already. FWIW, we'll probably move cygwin to subversion as soon as the gcc dust has settled. cgf