From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8334 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2005 23:25:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8314 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Oct 2005 23:25:55 -0000 Received: from s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:25:55 +0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 4FB4247E6B; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:25:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:25:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mark Kettenis , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Moving GDB sources to subversion? Message-ID: <20051028232553.GB1155@adacore.com> References: <20051028222253.GX1155@adacore.com> <200510282256.j9SMu2pQ002862@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20051028231430.GA9909@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051028231430.GA9909@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2 > I'd rather not rehash the months of discussion from the GCC list about > this :-) > > >From my point of view: It is not my intention to push in any direction. I'll be happy to move to svn if most of us think it's better, but I'm also happy to stick to CVS. -- Joel