From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-22900-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 6726 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2005 23:25:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 6641 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Oct 2005 23:25:00 -0000
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:25:00 +0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2])
	by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9SNOHtM005495;
	Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:24:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9SNOHDk032441;
	Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:24:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j9SNOHql024377;
	Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:24:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:25:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200510282324.j9SNOHql024377@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20051028231430.GA9909@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel
	Jacobowitz on Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:14:30 -0400)
Subject: Re: Moving GDB sources to subversion?
References: <20051028222253.GX1155@adacore.com> <200510282256.j9SMu2pQ002862@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20051028231430.GA9909@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:14:30 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 12:56:02AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > 
> > Why should we?
> 
> I'd rather not rehash the months of discussion from the GCC list about
> this :-)

The we're on the same wavelength.  Let's put our effort into improving
GDB; not in changing our infrastructure, let alone discussions about
our infrastructure.

Mark