From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22603 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2005 23:02:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22592 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Oct 2005 23:02:09 -0000 Received: from s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:02:09 +0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 8A5D747E6B; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:02:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Moving GDB sources to subversion? Message-ID: <20051028230207.GZ1155@adacore.com> References: <20051028222253.GX1155@adacore.com> <200510282256.j9SMu2pQ002862@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200510282256.j9SMu2pQ002862@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00200.txt.bz2 > > I think GCC is getting ready to move to subversion as the revision > > control system. Is there any similar plan for GDB? > > Why should we? I wasn't implying that we should. I haven't seen any discussion about this (but maybe I missed them). However, I have heard rumors that GCC *is* going to move to svn. I think GCC and GDB have been in the same physical repository so far (src?), so I was afraid that a change for GCC would necessarily impact GDB. -- Joel