From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24644 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2005 19:08:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24624 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Oct 2005 19:08:18 -0000 Received: from web81203.mail.yahoo.com (HELO web81203.mail.yahoo.com) (206.190.37.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with SMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:08:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 70091 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Oct 2005 19:08:14 -0000 Message-ID: <20051027190814.70089.qmail@web81203.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [192.249.47.11] by web81203.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:08:14 PDT Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:08:00 -0000 From: Ron McCall Subject: Re: PowerPC 603 Register Set Clarification To: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20051027183530.GA29470@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2 --- Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Sorry, I maint maint print registers. raw-reg will > work just as well. > > I'm not sure (re the P packet). An empty response > won't work. But 00 > should work well enough, or else use 'x'. I missed maint print registers after seeing the raw-registers subcommand. Good to know. Thanks. I didn't know about the 'x' response but I see it in fetch_register_using_p() in remote.c and sure enough, that's what makes it happy! (An error, empty response or '0' response certainly don't make it happy.) Thanks! Ron McCall