From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22365 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2005 16:42:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22349 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2005 16:42:55 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:42:55 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ESzyn-00017b-Pi; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:42:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: ".:SB:." Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Suitable DDD release to be used with GDB release 4.18 Message-ID: <20051021164253.GC4187@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: ".:SB:." , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <43590D36.60608@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43590D36.60608@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00127.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 05:45:58PM +0200, .:SB:. wrote: > Hi all > > Just finished some modifs to gdb 4.18 source regarding support for ARC > systems and i'm going to test that modified gdb is usable with ddd and > wondering which is the correct version to try for ddd, i mean, which > version of ddd is best suited for gdb 4.18. This isn't the right list to ask questions about ddd. Try a ddd list. Or try using a very of GDB that isn't so many years old! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC