From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15175 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2005 14:11:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15126 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jul 2005 14:10:59 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:10:59 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Dt4QT-0000Ue-Fa; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:10:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:11:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: problem debugging assembler functions Message-ID: <20050714141057.GA1863@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200507141254.42149.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20050714134548.GB531@nevyn.them.org> <200507141808.09859.ghost@cs.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200507141808.09859.ghost@cs.msu.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00169.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 06:08:09PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Generally nothing goes in without a patch being submitted (with > > changelog, to gdb-patches). > > Okay, I'll post the patch there. Thanks. > > It sounds like you're doing a lot of work > > on GDB; have you considered getting a copyright assignment on file? > > Am I required to do so? The two patches I've sent so far are fairly trivial. These two probably don't need it; it was a suggestion for any future work. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC