From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-22208-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15462 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2005 14:11:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15132 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jul 2005 14:10:59 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:10:59 +0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1Dt428-0000B6-A3; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:45:48 -0400
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:11:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: problem debugging assembler functions
Message-ID: <20050714134548.GB531@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <d8m7a8$akn$1@sea.gmane.org> <200506141919.22749.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20050614152726.GA5039@nevyn.them.org> <200507141254.42149.ghost@cs.msu.su>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200507141254.42149.ghost@cs.msu.su>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00171.txt.bz2

On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:54:41PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 June 2005 19:27, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > > So, moving 'find_pc_line' above will reasult in extra lookup only if
> > > - the command is stepi/nexti, or
> > > - the first condition evaluates to true (which means we've entered
> > >   undebuggable code)
> > >
> > > I have no idea is that's bad or not performance-wise, just clarifying
> > > what's going on.
> >
> > Hmm, that's encouraging!  This might be a good improvement, then.
> 
> So, is this change going in?
> 
> I attach the patch I'm using locally for your reference.

Generally nothing goes in without a patch being submitted (with
changelog, to gdb-patches).  It sounds like you're doing a lot of work
on GDB; have you considered getting a copyright assignment on file?


-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC