From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27195 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2005 13:14:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27011 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2005 13:14:16 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 13:14:16 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.51) id 1Dq9jC-0006NC-69; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 09:14:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 13:14:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Karganov Konstantin Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI usage inside a user-defined commands Message-ID: <20050706131413.GA24446@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Karganov Konstantin , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 04:16:52PM +0400, Karganov Konstantin wrote: > Hello, all. > > It seems that user-defined commands are always parsed by console cmd-line > interpreter (no matter what interpreter was specified). Yes, that's correct. define is a feature of the CLI, not of core GDB. I think this is as designed. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC