From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21620 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2005 21:39:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21611 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2005 21:39:28 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:39:28 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.51) id 1DoTEN-0007kE-5B; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:39:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:39:00 -0000 From: 'Daniel Jacobowitz' To: Parker James E Contr AFRL/HEDR Cc: "'gdb@sources.redhat.com'" Subject: Re: gdb and Fortran90 arrays Message-ID: <20050701213927.GA29735@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Parker James E Contr AFRL/HEDR , "'gdb@sources.redhat.com'" References: <6AC29D5306A1CD4AB6A168570B1176A40797B30F@casino.brooks.af.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6AC29D5306A1CD4AB6A168570B1176A40797B30F@casino.brooks.af.mil> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:29:13PM -0500, Parker James E Contr AFRL/HEDR wrote: > Yes, > If you mean attempt to > (gdb) set language fortran > > gdb assumes you mean fortran77, and then complains that the array > definitions are invalid -- doesn't like definitions that include Fortran90 > constructs like intent(in) > > But if you mean downloading the most current version of gdb from CVS, that I > haven't tried. Currently, I'm using version 6.1 dated 20040607, I didn't > see that 6.2 or 6.3 improved the Fortran90 support. Do you know of a fix > that was implemented? Sure. I don't think much Fortran90 support was added, but general Fortran array access was recently fixed to not be treated as a function call. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC