From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12035 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2005 22:11:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12024 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jun 2005 22:11:42 -0000 Received: from faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (HELO faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de) (131.188.30.103) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:11:42 +0000 Received: from faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.30.103]) by faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5RMBeS8023863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:11:40 GMT Received: (from sithglan@localhost) by faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) id j5RMBexc023862 for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:11:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:11:00 -0000 From: Thomas Glanzmann To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb eats 100% cpu for relative long time when I single step one instruction Message-ID: <20050627221140.GH8659@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Mail-Followup-To: Thomas Glanzmann , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20050627212704.GD8659@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20050627214826.GA756@nevyn.them.org> <20050627215915.GE8659@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20050627220236.GA1364@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050627220236.GA1364@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00273.txt.bz2 Hello, > Sorry, this doesn't tell me much. I'd need backtraces inside GDB to > know what it thinks it is doing. Okay. I will recompile gdb tomorrow with debugging symbols and provide a backtrace. Anything I should obey? Thomas