From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: aborted thread backtrace stops at sighandler call
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200506242153.j5OLrEPi014281@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050624151129.GH66895@keyslapper.net> (message from Louis LeBlanc on Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:11:29 -0400)
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:11:29 -0400
From: Louis LeBlanc <dev@keyslapper.net>
Hey everyone.
I've got an app that seems ok under some pretty heavy load, but once
in a great while, it blows up during some network related operation,
particularly host name lookups. I'm having similar problems with
other apps (even perl scripts) on the same OS (Solaris 8 & 9).
On sparc or i386?
Well, often these were bus errors and gdb just couldn't nail things
down for me. Finally, I decided to catch these signals (SIGBUS,
SIGSEGV) and collect what info I could before calling abort() - which
preserves the stack pretty well according to pstack. When a problem
arises, I can look at the pstack output and see quite clearly that the
problem is this screwy network glitch I've never been able to track
down. Problem is when it's something else, gdb doesn't seem to be
able to see the preserved stack.
Anyone have any idea how to get this?
Sorry, but I don't understand your problem. Is it the fact that gdb's
backtrace is different from the backtrace shown by pstack?
This is the backtrace for the aborted thread:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xfea1f82c in __tbl_2_huge_digits () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
#1 0xfe9d0a24 in sysconf () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
#2 0xfe9b6ce0 in ascftime () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
#3 0x0003c72c in XPCSigCheck (Sig=11, Info=0xfe776ad0, Context=0xfe776818) at xpcsig.c:347
#4 0xff365b14 in ?? ()
#5 0xff365b18 in ?? ()
Previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
But pstack shows this:
----------------- lwp# 3 / thread# 3 --------------------
fea1f82c _lwp_kill (6, 0, fe7765b8, fe776630, 0, 1) + 8
fe9b6cd8 abort (df708, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 100
0003c724 XPCSigCheck (b, fe776ad0, fe776818, 0, 0, 0) + 2c0
ff365b0c __sighndlr (b, fe776ad0, fe776818, 3c464, 0, 0) + c
ff35f804 call_user_handler (b, fe776ad0, fe776818, 0, 0, 0) + 234
ff35f9b4 sigacthandler (b, fe776ad0, fe776818, 7efefeff, 81010100, 0) + 64
--- called from signal handler with signal 11 (SIGSEGV) ---
fe9b44e4 strlen (fe7778c0, 0, fe777850, 0, 0, 0) + 80
fea08c98 vsnprintf (fe7784c0, c00, fe7778c0, fe779118, 7300, fe7778c0) + 5c
000d3390 ERROR (dffa8, 0, 7530, 1, 81010100, 3d740) + 48
0003d590 make_ssl_connection (fe779368, a060164, 0, fd043b8, 7530, fe77bed0) + 57c
000300c0 handle_check (10e800, dc290, ffffd438, 1, 0, 5b7550) + 1c08
000d7bbc spawn (fcaa2b0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 20
ff3657b4 _lwp_start (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
BTW, I am using gdb 6.3.50.20050621-cvs - it's the only one I've found
that doesn't bonk rolling over the end of a thread stack on Solaris.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-24 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-24 15:11 Louis LeBlanc
2005-06-24 18:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-24 18:52 ` Jason Molenda
2005-06-24 21:53 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2005-06-24 22:27 ` Louis LeBlanc
2005-06-25 15:28 ` Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200506242153.j5OLrEPi014281@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox