From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30795 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2005 01:48:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30763 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2005 01:47:57 -0000 Received: from w098.z064220152.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net (HELO bluesmobile.specifixinc.com) (64.220.152.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:47:57 +0000 Received: from diveadx (bluesmobile.corp.specifix.com [192.168.1.2]) by bluesmobile.specifixinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F3816A21; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:47:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Fred Fish Reply-To: fnf@specifixinc.com To: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [Gdb-discuss] Re: x86 Q: why aren't the SSE intrinsics always_inline? Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:48:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: Andrew Haley , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org References: <96B69900-04F0-406A-9B53-F74B6D2B8071@apple.com> <200506142112.39968.fnf@specifixinc.com> <20050615011738.GA30673@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20050615011738.GA30673@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506142147.53711.fnf@specifixinc.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 14 June 2005 21:17, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Ask me if you want either set of code. Sure, I'd like to take a look at it. > If you want to work on anything without duplicating effort, it behooves > _you_ to discuss it on the mailing lists first. Agreed. I've just recently started looking at this issue for gdb and so far am still just reading and tracing through the code that handles frames since it has been a long time since I've worked in this area of gdb. Once I have a better handle on how things currently work I was planning to post something to get a discussion going. -Fred